Crimes Act 1900 No 40
Historical version for 1 January 1991 to 16 March 1991 (accessed 26 May 2013 at 07:32) Current version

409B   Admissibility of evidence relating to sexual experience etc

(1)  In this section:

the accused person, in relation to any proceedings, means the person who stands, or any of the persons who stand, charged in those proceedings with a prescribed sexual offence.

the complainant, in relation to any proceedings, means the person, or any of the persons, upon whom a prescribed sexual offence with which the accused person stands charged in those proceedings is alleged to have been committed.

(2)  In prescribed sexual offence proceedings, evidence relating to the sexual reputation of the complainant is inadmissible.
(3)  In prescribed sexual offence proceedings, evidence which discloses or implies that the complainant has or may have had sexual experience or a lack of sexual experience or has or may have taken part or not taken part in any sexual activity is inadmissible except:
(a)  where it is evidence:
(i)  of sexual experience or a lack of sexual experience of, or sexual activity or a lack of sexual activity taken part in by, the complainant at or about the time of the commission of the alleged prescribed sexual offence, and
(ii)  of events which are alleged to form part of a connected set of circumstances in which the alleged prescribed sexual offence was committed,
(b)  where it is evidence relating to a relationship which was existing or recent at the time of the commission of the alleged prescribed sexual offence, being a relationship between the accused person and the complainant,
(c)  where:
(i)  the accused person is alleged to have had sexual intercourse, as defined in section 61A (1), with the complainant and the accused person does not concede the sexual intercourse so alleged, and
(ii)  it is evidence relevant to whether the presence of semen, pregnancy, disease or injury is attributable to the sexual intercourse alleged to have been had by the accused person,
(d)  where it is evidence relevant to whether:
(i)  at the time of the commission of the alleged prescribed sexual offence, there was present in the complainant a disease which, at any relevant time, was absent in the accused person, or
(ii)  at any relevant time, there was absent in the complainant a disease which, at the time of the commission of the alleged prescribed sexual offence, was present in the accused person,
(e)  where it is evidence relevant to whether the allegation that the prescribed sexual offence was committed by the accused person was first made following a realisation or discovery of the presence of pregnancy or disease in the complainant (being a realisation or discovery which took place after the commission of the alleged prescribed sexual offence), or
(f)  where it is evidence given by the complainant in cross-examination by or on behalf of the accused person, being evidence given in answer to a question which may, pursuant to subsection (5), be asked,
      and its probative value outweighs any distress, humiliation or embarrassment which the complainant might suffer as a result of its admission.
(4)  In prescribed sexual offence proceedings, a witness shall not be asked:
(a)  to give evidence which is inadmissible under subsection (2) or (3), or
(b)  by or on behalf of the accused person, to give evidence which is or may be admissible under subsection (3) unless the Court or Justice has previously decided that the evidence would, if given, be admissible.
(5)  In prescribed sexual offence proceedings, where the Court or Justice is satisfied that:
(a)  it has been disclosed or implied in the case for the prosecution against the accused person that the complainant has or may have, during a specified period or without reference to any period:
(i)  had sexual experience, or a lack of sexual experience, of a general or specified nature, or
(ii)  taken part or not taken part in sexual activity of a general or specified nature, and
(b)  the accused person might be unfairly prejudiced if the complainant could not be cross-examined by or on behalf of the accused person in relation to the disclosure or implication,
      the complainant may be so cross-examined but only in relation to the experience or activity of the nature (if any) so specified during the period (if any) so specified.
(6)  On the trial of a person, any question as to the admissibility of evidence under subsection (2) or (3) or the right to cross-examine under subsection (5) shall be decided by the Judge in the absence of the jury.
(7)  Where a Court or Justice has decided that evidence is admissible under subsection (3), the Court or Justice shall, before the evidence is given, record or cause to be recorded in writing the nature and scope of the evidence that is so admissible and the reasons for that decision.
(8)  Nothing in this section authorises the admission of evidence of a kind which was inadmissible immediately before the commencement of this section.
Top of page