First Home Owner Grant (New Homes) Act 2000 No 21
Current version for 1 October 2012 to date (accessed 23 May 2013 at 04:17)
Part 2Division 6

Division 6 Objections and reviews

Subdivision 1 Objections

25   Objections

(1)  An applicant (or former applicant) for a first home owner grant who is dissatisfied with any of the following decisions of the Chief Commissioner may lodge a written objection to the decision with the Chief Commissioner:
(a)  a decision on the person’s application for a first home owner grant (including a decision to vary or reverse an earlier decision made independently of an objection under this Act),
(b)  a decision to require the person to repay an amount under section 45,
(c)  a decision to require the person to pay a penalty under section 45.
(1A)  A person who is dissatisfied with a decision of the Chief Commissioner to require the person, instead of a grant recipient, to pay a recoverable amount under section 46A may lodge a written objection to the decision with the Chief Commissioner.
(2)  The grounds of objection must be stated fully and in detail in the notice of objection.
(3)  The objection must be lodged within 60 days after the date of the notice of the decision.
(4)  If the Chief Commissioner is satisfied that an objector has a reasonable excuse for failing to lodge an objection within the 60-day period, the Chief Commissioner may extend the time for lodging the objection.

26   Powers of Chief Commissioner on objection

(1)  After considering an objection, the Chief Commissioner may:
(a)  allow the objection in whole or in part or may disallow the objection, and
(b)  accordingly reverse, vary or confirm the decision (the original decision) to which the objection was made.
(2)  The Chief Commissioner must give the objector written notice of the determination of the objection.
(3)  The Chief Commissioner must, in the notice, give the reasons for disallowing the objection or for allowing the objection in part only.
(4)  The reasons for a determination of an objection must set out the matters referred to in section 49 (3) of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 in respect of the determination.
(5)  The notice must also inform the objector of the objector’s right to make an application for review under Subdivision 2 in the case of a determination to disallow the objection or to allow the objection in part only.

27   (Repealed)

Subdivision 2 Reviews

28   Reviews by Administrative Decisions Tribunal

(1)  An objector may apply to the Administrative Decisions Tribunal for a review of the decision (the original decision) to which the objection was made if:
(a)  the objector is dissatisfied with the Chief Commissioner’s determination of the objection, or
(b)  90 days have passed since the objection was lodged with the Chief Commissioner and the Chief Commissioner has not determined the objection.
(2)  The applicant’s and respondent’s cases on an application for review are not limited to the grounds of the objection.
(3)  The applicant has the onus of proving the applicant’s case in an application for review.
(4)  An application for review:
(a)  following a determination by the Chief Commissioner of an objection—must be made not later than 60 days after the date of issue of the notice of the Chief Commissioner’s determination of the objection, or
(b)  following a failure of the Chief Commissioner to determine an objection within the relevant 90-day period—may be made at any time after the end of that period (but must be made as required by paragraph (a) following a subsequent determination of the objection by the Chief Commissioner).
(5)  The Administrative Decisions Tribunal may extend the time for making an application for review.
(6)  The following provisions of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 do not apply to an application made under this section:
(a)  Part 2 of Chapter 5,
(b)  section 55 (1) (b) and (d),
(c)  Division 2 of Part 3 of Chapter 5.
(7)  For the purposes of section 58 (1) (a) of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997:
(a)  the obligation of the Chief Commissioner under that paragraph to lodge a statement of reasons with the Administrative Decisions Tribunal in respect of an application is limited to providing the Tribunal with a statement of reasons only in respect of the matters arising from the grounds specified in the application, and
(b)  if one of the grounds specified in the application relates to a matter raised in an objection determined by the Chief Commissioner—the Chief Commissioner may rely on reasons previously given to the objector by the Chief Commissioner under section 26 for the determination of the objection in explanation of that part of the original decision.

29   Powers of Administrative Decisions Tribunal on review

(1)  On a review, the Administrative Decisions Tribunal may:
(a)  confirm, vary or reverse the original decision, and
(b)  make any further orders as to costs or otherwise as it thinks fit.
(2)  Subsection (1) does not limit the generality of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 5 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997.
Top of page